<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0, boohoo</title>
	<link>http://blog.jiboneus.com/2005/12/03/web-20-boohoo/</link>
	<description>Computer Wizardry, Esoteric Spirituality, and Mind-altering Substances</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Web 2.0, boohoo by: Web2.0 is dead? at blog . jiboneus</title>
		<link>http://blog.jiboneus.com/2005/12/03/web-20-boohoo/#comment-16</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jiboneus.com/2005/12/03/web-20-boohoo/#comment-16</guid>
					<description>[...] I&amp;#8217;ve talk about web2.0 a couple of times, here, here and here. I guess some of the Web2.0 fanboys have had enough of the term &amp;#8220;Web2.0&amp;#8243; being use for marketing slogan. I guess too many start-up companies define themself as a Web2.0 company just so that it will add value to the company. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;ve talk about web2.0 a couple of times, here, here and here. I guess some of the Web2.0 fanboys have had enough of the term &#8220;Web2.0&#8243; being use for marketing slogan. I guess too many start-up companies define themself as a Web2.0 company just so that it will add value to the company. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
